You should be here pyramid
Ronz ( talk) 16:58, 18 March 2012 (UTC) If they are for inclusion, we have plenty of time to add them in. A list of some possible sources is at the top of this page. There are many sources we could use to better illustrate the pseudoscience and general propaganda being peddled by the foundation. Haploidavey ( talk) 12:18, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Not just any old Mystic Beams™, measured in hertz, but ones that defy the inverse-square law mind you :) - 163.1.146.16 ( talk) 20:13, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Thanks for adding the diff. Mystic beams, measured in hertz, no less. If we needed an illustration of the foundation's "scientific credibility", we could do a lot worse than those "beams" - not just any old beams either. Ronz ( talk) 01:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC) By which I think Ronz means the stuff removed here, quite agree, if it's for inclusion non-related (and reliable) sources will cover it, we're in no hurry to finish this right?- 163.1.146.16 ( talk) 07:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Pity though. We need independent, reliable sources to demonstrate the material deserves mention and provide us context for presenting the information per NPOV. I'm sure they're going to play up the 2012 phenomenon as much as possible. Let's not let them use this as a soapbox for their claims. We've established that the foundation is not a reliable source. Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.190.28 ( talk) 03:33, 3 February 2012 (UTC) Beams Dougweller ( talk) 20:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Įrm, these arent "my" opinions, if you followed the links, you would see all the various scientists supporting the claim. Geologists see natural formations there, whatever your opinion might be. Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.190.28 ( talk) 19:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC) This isn't a forum to debate whether these are hills or manmade pyramids. I'm guessing this isnt credible evidence? and this huge project and the people involved that are willing to put their careers on the line are just being duped? No doubt i'll get this comment deleted but at least look at the first link, that is undeniable that those are paved stones.
I suggest watching the whole conference (its 40 minutes long, but she goes into great detail) as she validates multiple times of very likely man made construction workĪ detailed video of a possible artifical structure in the tunnels underneath the complex, attempts of digging it out and a discovery of a closed off area which is very probable man madeĭr Zubrow's opinion's on the Pyramid Complex, and a list of scientists that support the theory and reserch and are willing to associate themselves with the project I'm sorry, but has no one been following MULTIPLE youtube videos on this? videos which show paved stones and brick walls? the caves with multiple enclosed drywalls? what? why the complete denial that this could be a pyramid complex?ĭr Sara Aconcci's excavations of a possible man made channel of water in the tunnels.
30 Timothy Moon, who runs the archaeological dig, is a record producer.19 Is the neutrality of this article still disputed?.17 How is 6:1 NOT a valid vote for Wikipedia? I am reverting the title to Bosnian hill hoax.15 Move to clarify Semir Osmanagić's personal page.14.1.1 Discussion of WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, WP:NPOV, etc.14 Move to rename the article from 'Bosnian pyramids' to 'Bosnian pyramids hoax'.13 "Bosnian pyramids" instead of Bosnian pyramids.10 recent study reveals an energy beam emanating from the Pyramid of the Sun (lol).8 Online Petition signed by lead archaeologists against Bosnian pyramids hoax.7 "Scientific explanations" contains extraneous material.